Prediction of Carol Dixon vs Patricia Cumming Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Dixon vs P. Cumming

Carol Dixon

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

106

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Patricia Cumming

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

106

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Dixon 1 - 0 Cumming

They have played 2 sets in total, with Carol Dixon winning 2 and Patricia Cumming winning 0. The last match between Carol Dixon and Patricia Cumming was at the US National Championships, 27-08-1942, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Carol Dixon getting the victory 6-3 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Dixon	1
Cumming	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) US National Championships(08-27-42)

Stats

Carol Dixon

Patricia Cumming

C. Dixon vs P. Cumming H2H Profile

C. Dixon	Stats	P. Cumming
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
44.44% (4-5)	Career Total W/L	40.82% (40-58)
1	Grass	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Dixon vs P. Cumming Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carol Dixon has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Patricia Cumming has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carol Dixon, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Patricia Cumming has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Carol Dixon has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Patricia Cumming has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Carol Dixon has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Patricia Cumming winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Carol Dixon has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 50% (W/L 1/1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/2). Patricia Cumming has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 12/10), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 35% (W/L 19/35).
Player level: In the last year, Carol Dixon has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Patricia Cumming has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Carol Dixon winning 1 times and Patricia Cumming being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Carol Dixon winning 2 and Patricia Cumming winning 0.
The last match between Carol Dixon and Patricia Cumming was at the US National Championships, 27-08-1942, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Carol Dixon getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carol Dixon has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Patricia Cumming has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carol Dixon has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Patricia Cumming has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Carol Dixon has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Patricia Cumming has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Carol Dixon vs Patricia Cumming Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Dixon vs P. Cumming H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Dixon	Stats	P. Cumming
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	6
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Dixon Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Jackson Heights - 16-07-1945
R2 Ann EdisonA. Edison	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
Brooklyn - 05-07-1945
R4 Betty PrattB. Pratt	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
R3 Nina IrwinN. Irwin	W	6-8 6-2 6-3	Stats
Hackensack - 30-06-1945
R4 Lilian LopausL. Lopaus	L	7-5 6-0	Stats
R3 Natasha IrwinN. Irwin	W	3-6 6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

P. Cumming Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
US National Championships - 27-08-1950
R2 Helen PerezH. Perez	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
South Orange - 31-07-1950
R3 Louise BroughL. Brough	L	6-0 6-2	Stats
US National Championships - 29-08-1949
R3 Helen PerezH. Perez	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Lee Van KeurenL. Van	W	6-1 6-0	Stats
Orange - 01-08-1949
R3 Nancy MorrisonN. Morrison	L	6-1 6-1	Stats

View All

C. Dixon vs P. Cumming Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Dixon	Stats	P. Cumming
44.44% (4/5)	YTD Win/Loss	40.82% (40/58)
40.00% (8/12)	Sets Win/Loss	40.78% (84/122)
47.06% (88/99)	Games Win/Loss	46.58% (837/960)
50.00% (2/2)	Clay Win/Loss	54.55% (12/10)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	44.44% (4/5)
33.33% (1/2)	Grass Win/Loss	35.19% (19/35)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
50.00% (1/1)	Slam W/L	9.09% (1/10)
44% (4/9)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	39% (36/93)
100% (2/2)	Deciding Set Win %	39% (7/18)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	89% (37/33)
0% (2/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (37/4)
29% (7/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	7% (58/4)